Defined: Royal Assent
Something I must clear up before I go on, and one that some of my readers have asked me about. Why do I keep coming back to the statement that there is almost always “a version of this…”? Humans have a heuristic called “cognitive ease,” or the “Law of Least Effort.” There is always a simpler version, and while it provides an explanation, it often misses the importance of what is happening. These blog posts and articles aim to explain these matters in a little more depth to help make a complex matter a little simpler.
Royal Assent is the moment a bill becomes an Act: The State Governor's formal signature that gives a passed bill the force of law. Most of the time, it is exactly as unremarkable as it sounds. Once, it was the whole argument.
There's a version of this glossary entry that stops at the definition. Royal Assent: the Governor signs, the bill becomes law, end of entry. That's technically correct and almost entirely unhelpful, because it tells you nothing about why the step exists or when it has ever mattered.
This is one of the many “checks and balances” in place to ensure democracy isn’t just bypassed.
What actually happens
Once a bill has passed both houses of the NSW Parliament in identical form, it goes to the State Governor. The Governor assents on legal advice from the Attorney General. In ordinary practice this is a formality: by the time a bill reaches this stage, it already carries the numbers of both houses behind it, and the Governor is not weighing the bill's merits; that argument has already been had, and won, on the floor of Parliament.
An Act commences 28 days after Assent, unless the Act specifies a different date or leaves commencement to proclamation. Assent and commencement are not the same moment: a bill can be law and still not yet be in force.
Where it isn't a formality
Assent stops being automatic in one specific circumstance: bills that touch the existence, terms, or number of members of the Legislative Council, or that amend the constitutional safeguard protecting that requirement itself, cannot be presented for Assent at all unless they have first been approved by the people of New South Wales at a referendum. This is the manner-and-form requirement written into the Constitution Act 1902 (s 7A); a rule Parliament cannot simply vote around, because voting around it is the one thing the rule is built to stop.
That safeguard was itself put beyond ordinary repeal: the only way it could be repealed was by referendum; and in 1961, New South Wales voters were asked to entrench the requirement that any future attempt to abolish or restructure the Legislative Council would need their approval too. The mechanism and the guarantee were created in the same vote.
Why a formality is worth defining
A step that is procedural 99% of the time is still worth naming, because the one exception is the whole point. Royal Assent looks like a rubber stamp until the bill in front of it touches the composition of Parliament itself, and at that exact moment, the Governor's signature stops being available on request and starts depending on a referendum result the government of the day does not control.
That is not a flaw in the process. It is the process protecting the thing that makes it a process at all.
Comments